Workstream:

Quality, Data and Outcomes

The Quality, Data and Outcomes Workstream is focused on identifying and recommending measurable indicators that help assess the impact of malnutrition and nutrition care. The workstream aims to establish a consistent approach to measuring malnutrition prevalence, care practices, and outcomes, while supporting evaluation of the recommendations developed through the wider MCANZ work programme.

‍

Without robust measures and reliable national data, it is difficult to understand the prevalence and impact of malnutrition, evaluate the effectiveness of nutrition care, or monitor progress over time. This workstream supports the development of meaningful measures to inform quality improvement, reduce inequities, and strengthen malnutrition care.

Priorities

Current focus areas include:
  • Identifying measures that capture malnutrition screening, assessment, diagnosis, treatment, monitoring and evaluation across the nutrition care pathway.
  • Reviewing international evidence and commonly used malnutrition outcome measures.
  • Working with subject matter experts and MCANZ workstreams to refine and validate recommended indicators.
  • Developing approaches for data collection, management, and implementation that support national adoption of agreed measures.
  • Recommending a minimum set of audit standards to support monitoring of a National Malnutrition Policy.
  • Ensuring outcome measures are meaningful and relevant to the population of Aotearoa New Zealand.

Intended Outcomes/Goals

The Quality, Data and Outcomes Workstream aims to support a nationally consistent approach to measuring malnutrition care and outcomes.

If adopted and implemented, the workstream's recommendations are intended to:

  • Establish meaningful indicators for measuring malnutrition prevalence, care practices and outcomes across in scope healthcare settings.
  • Enable benchmarking and comparison of malnutrition-related practices and outcomes.
  • Promote more consistent and evidence-informed malnutrition care through monitoring against agreed standards and targets.
  • Support continuous quality improvement through reliable data and meaningful outcome measurement.
  • Enable the consistent collection and reporting of national malnutrition data.
  • Support evidence-informed decisions and service development.
  • Generate insights that help identify and reduce inequities in malnutrition care and outcomes for Māori, Pacific peoples and all New Zealanders.

Scope and Coverage

This workstream focuses on identifying and measuring the impact of malnutrition and nutrition care across:
  • Public and private hospital services across primary, secondary and tertiary care.
  • Community services and aged residential care.
  • Universities and dietetic training providers.
  • National malnutrition policy development and implementation.
  • Measures relating to the structure, process and outcomes of malnutrition care.
  • Cost and cost-analysis measures associated with malnutrition care.
  • Other contracted services, including rehabilitation services and mental health and addiction services.
The following populations and settings are not currently included within the scope of the Quality, Data and Outcomes Workstream:
  • Adults receiving care for eating disorders.

Latest Updates

Recent progress includes:

  • Completion of an international review of malnutrition measures, outcomes, and possible data points.
  • Summary of most utilised malnutrition measures across the nutrition care pathway.

‍

Summary of frequently used international quality measures for malnutrition across the Nutrition Care Process pathway

Screening

  • Malnutrition screening rate
  • Rescreening compliance

Assessment

  • Use of validated assessment tool
  • Time to assessment

Diagnosis

  • Malnutrition rates / prevalence
  • Use of validated malnutrition diagnostic tool

Care plan / Intervention / Treatment

  • Use of Nutrition care plan documents
  • Nutrition care treatment meets complete nutritional needs

Monitoring & evaluation

  • Monitoring of food intake
  • Resolution of nutrition diagnosis statements
  • Track / shorten hospital length of stay
  • 30-day readmission rate

‍

Next Steps

  • Create well defined, feasible measures in collaboration with each workstream.
  • Each measure will need a clear definition of who is included, what is being measured, when it is measured and where the information comes from. Where possible, results should also be compared across different population groups, healthcare settings and regions to help identify inequities.
  • Develop practical platform(s) and reporting mechanisms.

Governance

The MCANZ workstreams are guided by a Steering Group, which provides strategic oversight and helps ensure the work reflects clinical, community and health system needs across Aotearoa New Zealand.

Workstream Chair

  • Laura Cheadle, MSc Nutrition and Dietetics, NZRD

Members

  • Maz Black NZRD, PGDipDiet
  • Jo Stewart, NZRD, Dip HSc, PGDip Community Nutrition.
  • Lisa Henderson, NZRD, MSc

Past member: Dr. Catherine Wall, PhD, NZRD

References and Resources

White, J. V., Guenter, P., Jensen, G., Malone, A., & Schofield, M. (2012). Consensus statement: Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Characteristics recommended for the identification and documentation of adult malnutrition (undernutrition). Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 112(5), 730–738.
Robinson, K., Lago, A., & Allen, S. (n.d.). Driving change: Implementing the Malnutrition Quality Improvement Initiative (MQii) across the ecosystem of healthcare.
Regional Nutrition Working Group. (2018). Tackling undernutrition in the Asian healthcare setting: A Southeast Asian expert consensus. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN.
Queensland Health. (2017). An evidence-based demand management toolkit for dietetic services: Framework for effective and efficient dietetic services (Version 3.0). Queensland Government.
Pertel, D., et al. (2025). 2025 updates to the Malnutrition Care Score: Expanding age criteria to enhance malnutrition care and improve health equity. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
https://www.sciencedirect.com
NSW Government. (2025). Evidence check: Nutrition care policy.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2017). Nutrition support for adults: Oral nutrition support, enteral tube feeding and parenteral nutrition (Clinical Guideline CG32).
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg32
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2012). Nutrition support in adults: Quality statement 3. Documentation and communication of results and nutrition support goals.
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs24/chapter/Quality-statement-3-Documentation-and-communication-of-results-and-nutrition-support-goals
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2012). Nutrition support in adults: Quality statement 1. Screening for the risk of malnutrition.
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs24/chapter/Quality-statement-1-Screening-for-the-risk-of-malnutrition
Gramlich, L., Keller, H. H., Valaitis, R., Laur, C. V., McNicholl, T., Xu, Y., Dubin, J. A., Curtis, L., Obiorah, S., Ray, S., Bernier, P., Stickles-White, M., Laporte, M., & Bell, J. (2017). Multi-site implementation of nutrition screening and diagnosis in medical care units: Success of the More-2-Eat project. Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research.
Dietitians of Canada. (2014). An interprofessional approach to malnutrition in hospitalised adults.
Department of Health. (2020). Nutrition screening and use of oral nutrition support for adults in acute care settings: National Clinical Guideline No. 22. Department of Health, Ireland.
Cederholm, T., Bosaeus, I., Barazzoni, R., Bauer, J., Van Gossum, A., Klek, S., Muscaritoli, M., Nyulasi, I., Ockenga, J., Schneider, S. M., De van der Schueren, M. A. E., & Singer, P. (2015). Diagnostic criteria for malnutrition: An ESPEN consensus statement. Clinical Nutrition, 34(3), 335–340.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25799486/
Canadian Malnutrition Task Force. (2021). Malnutrition prevention, detection and treatment standard 2021: A National Standard of Canada.
Canadian Malnutrition Task Force. (2017). Integrated Nutrition Pathway for Acute Care (INPAC) implementation toolkit.
https://m2e.nutritioncareincanada.ca/
Bell, J. J., Young, A. M., Hill, J. M., Comans, T. A., Barnes, R., & Keller, H. H. (2021). Systematised, interdisciplinary malnutrition program for impLementation and evaluation delivers improved hospital nutrition care processes and patient reported experiences: An implementation study. Nutrients, 13(4), 1138.
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041138
Bechtold, M. L., et al. (2023). Interprofessional implementation of the Global Malnutrition Composite Score quality measure. Nutrition in Clinical Practice.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37431796/
Alberta Health Services, Nutrition Services. (2024). Malnutrition strategy 2024–2029.
https://www.albertahealthservices.ca/assets/info/nutrition/if-nfs-malnutrition-strategy.pdf
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. (2024). Malnutrition Quality Improvement Initiative (MQii) toolkit.
https://www.malnutritionquality.org
Cederholm, T., Jensen, G. L., Correia, M. I. T. D., Gonzalez, M. C., Fukushima, R., Higashiguchi, T., … Compher, C. (2019). GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition: A consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 10(1), 207–217.
SNOMED International. SNOMED CT Implementation Guide for the Nutrition Care Process Terminology (NCPT). SNOMED International; 2026.
https://docs.snomed.org/implementation-guides/ncpt-implementation-guide